A group of thirty mothers were huddled for safety in a childbirth facility in El Fasher, Sudan, as the slaughter began. Among them were new mothers, while others were in the midst of labor.
Working that night, a 28-year-old lab technician, Abdo-Rabo Ahmed, lived to tell the tale. “The sounds of screaming reached me of women and children,” he states. “They executed everybody inside the hospital. Survival meant running for your life.”
This horrifying event stands as among the worst examples in the two-year civil war tearing the North African nation apart. Combatants raided the hospital, leaving dead more than 460 innocent people inside.
Rights organizations have labeled it “an act of unspeakable brutality,” and a prime example of the deteriorating protection for civilians trapped in war-torn areas in Ukraine, Gaza, Myanmar, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Sudan.
Although world powers are signatories to the international laws of war, which obligate them to protect civilians, the past year has seen a record number of violence targeting health services. Expectant mothers are particularly at risk due to their dependence on locally available medical care.
Data analysis and investigations uncover an alarming level of violence: nearly 300 violent acts against places and people associated with childbirth over the last three years, including at least 119 direct strikes on hospitals and delivery wards.
“This is not natural consequences of war. They represent a deliberate strategy of violence against reproduction.”
The majority of these assaults have occurred in regions embroiled in intense conflict, where countless of women bearing children are confined.
Deaths have occurred, blocked from reaching help, or compelled to deliver in deplorable situations. The data also indicates that at least 68 midwives, obstetricians, and gynaecologists have been murdered, 15 kidnapped, and 101 taken into custody—sometimes while assisting births.
Statistics are thought to be a significant underestimate, as they are limited to incidents documented publicly. In many areas of fighting, reporting is limited.
Last year, it was reported that half of all women who perished while pregnant or giving birth were in a conflict area. This underscores a catastrophic reality.
In addition to the loss of life, these attacks are wrecking maternal and neonatal care facilities, creating a grave danger to demographic stability.
In Gaza, the ruinous consequences on the right to maternal care has been cited by a UN commission as one reason behind accusations of genocidal acts.
Following truces, doctors report that women and children continue to die from inadequate care, owing to critical shortages of medicine and equipment. UN officials have relayed women having children by the roadside because hospitals were out of reach.
“Direct shelling hitting the wards, operating rooms, and maternity wards,” explains the head of a major hospital’s gynecology department. A military spokesperson has contested deliberately targeting maternity care or trying to alter birthrates.
Since early 2022, at least 80 childbirth centers have been attacked and rendered unusable in Ukraine. Accounts from embattled medical centers describe births occurring in shelters and skyrocketing stress leading to birth complications.
“We are being singled out,” asserts the head of obstetrics at a repeatedly damaged hospital in Kherson. Russian authorities have denied deliberately targeting civilians.
“The reality is, every facility is now a potential target,” comments a medical director in Sumy. “Even if air defence intercepts a drone, the falling debris may hit a hospital.”
For the over half a billion females living near active conflicts, there are minimal protections and even fewer war crimes prosecutions for those assaulting reproductive health.
This absence of consequences has fostered a “atmosphere of lawlessness,” explains a human rights lawyer. “Assaults against maternal services, like coerced birth or involuntary sterilization, may constitute acts of genocide by hindering reproduction.”
In El Fasher, the area was isolated from humanitarian aid long before the hospital attack, with malnutrition spiking dangerously, especially among children and pregnant women.
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, information is scarce because of a inability to report from rebel-held areas. Nevertheless, shelling in Goma damaged a maternity hospital, killing mothers, babies, and nurses.
In Myanmar, medical facilities have been bombed and dozens of midwives and patients have been arrested, killed, or injured over the past two years of civil war.
A large proportion of mother deaths are preventable with routine care, but war shatters health systems. Rights groups note that fear is now driving women away from facilities once considered safe, pushing them toward risky home births lacking professional help.
“When childbirth centers become intentional targets points toward a larger and alarming strategy: the use of violence against hospitals as a tool for terror and to tear apart the social fabric,” says a legal researcher.
“Hospitals are not completely safe for hospitals in war. Under the Geneva conventions, medical facilities are not inviolable if used for acts deemed ‘harmful to the enemy’, which has often been cited as an excuse.”
A professional poker strategist with over a decade of experience in online gaming and tournament analysis.
News
News
News
News
News
Brenda Key